ByteDance is scrambling to reinforce safeguards on its AI video generator, Seedance 2.0, as legal pressure mounts from major Hollywood studios.
The company’s response follows a wave of cease-and-desist letters accusing the platform of using copyrighted characters and likenesses without permission—fueling a growing debate over where artificial intelligence ends and intellectual property begins.
Hollywood Takes Aim at Seedance 2.0
The controversy intensified after Disney accused ByteDance of what it called “virtual smash-and-grab” tactics. In its cease-and-desist letter, Disney claimed Seedance 2.0 relied on a “pirated library” of recognizable characters from blockbuster franchises such as Marvel and Star Wars.
Soon after, Paramount issued its own warning, alleging the platform had reproduced protected content from several iconic properties, including:
Industry Groups Sound the Alarm
The Motion Picture Association (MPA) has also criticized the platform, warning that it lacks meaningful safeguards against copyright infringement.
MPA chair Charles Rivkin said services like Seedance threaten the very laws designed to protect artists and creators.
Meanwhile, SAG-AFTRA condemned the unauthorized use of performers’ voices and likenesses. The Human Artistry Campaign—supported by major Hollywood unions—called the platform harmful to creative workers worldwide.
Viral Clips Spark More Scrutiny
Launched February 12, Seedance 2.0 allows users to generate short, realistic video clips from simple text prompts. While some have praised its technical quality, others have raised red flags as AI-generated scenes featuring famous characters quickly spread online.
Examples circulating on social media included:
-
Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt in a rooftop fight
-
Anakin Skywalker and Padmé Amidala
-
Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool and Green Lantern fighting each other
These viral moments only intensified concerns that copyrighted characters were being used without permission.
Global Fallout
The controversy has spread beyond the U.S. The Japanese government has launched its own investigation into possible copyright violations connected to AI-generated anime content.
ByteDance has not disclosed the training data behind Seedance 2.0. However, it has temporarily disabled a feature that allowed users to upload images of real people—an apparent move to limit legal exposure.
What This Means for the Future of AI
The Seedance 2.0 dispute highlights the growing tension between fast-moving AI innovation and long-standing copyright laws. As studios push back and ByteDance tightens controls, the outcome of these legal battles could set the tone for how AI-generated content is regulated worldwide.
One thing is clear: the entertainment industry is drawing a firm line, and AI companies may soon be forced to rethink how they train and deploy creative tools.
Frank
